by Sei-Wan Kim (Ewha Womans University, Seoul)
Date: Friday, September 23
Time: 1:00pm
Location: SGMH-2301
by Sei-Wan Kim (Ewha Womans University, Seoul)
Date: Friday, September 23
Time: 1:00pm
Location: SGMH-2301
by Carol Tremblay & Victor Tremblay (Oregon State)
Date: Friday, September 16
Time: 1:00pm
Location: SGMH-2301
by Andreas Stathopulos (USC-Marshall School of Business)
Date: Friday, May 6
Time: 1:00PM
Location: SGMH-2405
by Jonathan Meer (Texas A & M)
Date: Friday, April 29
Time: 1:00PM
Location: SGMH-2405
by Federico Mandelman (Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta)
Date: Friday, April 15
Time: 1:00PM
Location: SGMH-2207
by David Neumark (UC Irvine)
Date: Wednesday, April 6
Time: 2:30PM
Location: SGMH-2405
David Neumark, (UC Irvine): “Detecting Discrimination in Audit and Correspondence Studies”
Date: Wednesday, April 6
Time: 2:30PM
Location: SGMH-2405
Federico Mandelman (Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta): “Monetary and Exchange Rate Policy Under Remittance Fluctuations”
Date: Friday, April 15
Time: 1:00PM
Location: SGMH-2207
Jonathan Meer (Texas A & M): “Translation”
Date: Friday, April 29
Time: 1:00PM
Location: SGMH-2405
Andreas Stathopulos (USC-Marshall School of Business): “Asset Prices and Risk Sharing in Open Economies”
Date: Friday, May 6
Time: 1:00PM
Location: SGMH-2405
by Mira Farka (CSUF)
by Andrew Healy (Loyola Marymount)
by Stefania D’Amico (Federal Reserve Board):
Using a panel of daily CUSIP-level data, we study the effects of the Federal Reserve’s program to purchase $300 billion of U.S. Treasury coupon securities announced and implemented during 2009. This program represented an unprecedented intervention in the Treasury market and thus allows us to shed light on the price elasticities and substitutability of Treasuries, preferred-habitat theories of the term structure, and the ability of large-scale asset purchases to reduce overall yields and improve market functioning. We find that each purchase operation, on average, caused a decline in yields in the sector purchased of 3.5 basis points on the days when these purchases occurred (the “flow effect” of the program). In addition, the program as a whole resulted in a persistent downward shift in the yield curve of as much as 50 basis points (the “stock effect”), with the largest impact in the 10- to 15-year sector. The coefficient patterns generally support a view of segmentation or imperfect substitution within the Treasury market.